UK military: Smaller in a competitive age
Video Summary
In this article, a Finnish defense blogger, Robin Häggblom, discusses the new British defense plan “Defense in a Competitive Age” and its implications for the British military. The plan aims to make the British military more adaptable and efficient in a rapidly changing world, but Häggblom is critical of its approach, arguing that it prioritizes cost-cutting over military effectiveness. He highlights several areas of concern, including the reduction in troop numbers, the elimination of certain aircraft and ships, and the lack of investment in surveillance and intelligence capabilities.
Regarding the Royal Navy, Häggblom notes that the plan foresees a reduction in the number of surface ships and the elimination of some types of vessels, such as the Hunt-class and Sandown-class mine countermeasures vessels. He is concerned about the impact this may have on the British ability to counter naval threats, particularly in the context of its NATO commitments. He also expresses disappointment that the plan does not prioritize investment in more modern and effective ships, such as the Type 26 and Type 31 frigates.
Turning to the Royal Air Force, Häggblom notes that the plan sees the end of the Sentinel fleet and the reduction of E-3D AWACS aircraft, with only three E-7A Wedgetail aircraft to replace them. He is critical of this approach, arguing that it will leave the RAF with insufficient capabilities for surveillance and reconnaissance.
In conclusion, Häggblom argues that the British plan for defense is flawed, as it prioritizes cost-cutting over military effectiveness. He believes that the military must be designed with a realistic view of what it can achieve, rather than trying to maintain a presence that is no longer sustainable. He recommends a more radical approach, where the military is designed around what is truly necessary, rather than what is desired, and where resources are allocated relative to the nation’s priorities.